Despair in a book is very hard for me to read. Despair from the past is better than despair based in the future. In the former case at least we know things got better. What does the the future of a very bleak future hold? There is very little hope. Sitting in Wisconsin on a poopy day adds another layer to the already existing despair in the book. It almost made me want to hoard food in the pantry. Despite all this I read the book.The book explores the human condition in a post apocalyptic world. There is not much said about how it came about, just that it is. The father and son take the road south in the hope of finding the 'good guys' who also 'carry the fire'. The narrative is crisp. The entire book is written without the use of quotation marks or apostrophe (don't is dont, won't is wont!). It adds something to the book. Makes it unattractive like the landscape and the life the words describe. I am not sure if this is an acknowledged writing style, but the usage in the novel is brilliant.
In the entire novel the father and son eat out of cans. The earth lacks a biosphere. Hence there are no plants, animals etc. The air is still breathable. How long can, what is left of humanity, survive on left over cans? What happens to left over people in countries that do not can food? Silly thoughts, but I did wonder about that. The book provides a first world perspective of what the human condition will be in such a future. What will the third world outlook look like? The survival skills of the third world is so much more different than the first world. The degree of despair and hardship will be so different.
The movie will be out during Thanksgiving. I cannot watch despair in a movie. Remember Artificial Intelligence, I desperately wanted to get out of the theater. So I will not watch this one.
